The practical questions before a custom workflow project.

We build focused browser extensions and workflow tools that connect websites, CMS environments, publishing information, localization, page quality, and the next useful editor action.

Page Assistant is the proven product foundation, but each customer implementation is scoped around its domains, CMS structure, roles, terminology, permissions, integrations, and deployment process.

The flagship experience is based on Adobe Experience Manager. Sitecore, Contentful, Optimizely, Drupal or Acquia, WordPress VIP, and other platforms can be evaluated through a workflow and technical discovery.

Yes. We can review an internal extension, bookmarklet, browser workflow, or manual process and propose a safer, more maintainable product direction.

A useful first conversation needs one real workflow, representative pages, the affected user roles, relevant environments, known exceptions, and the outcome your team wants.

No. Discovery is designed to turn operational knowledge into a clear product scope. Technical requirements are confirmed with the appropriate platform and security owners.

Yes. A narrow pilot with representative users and pages is usually the best way to validate usefulness, performance, permissions, and maintainability before expanding.

Timing depends on platform access, number of environments, mappings, integrations, security review, testing, and rollout scope. A quote separates discovery, pilot, and production milestones.

No. A responsible implementation uses the user’s active session and remains bounded by the permissions and destinations available to that user.

Only the minimum information required for the agreed workflow should be used. Authentication, data access, storage, and external API use are documented and reviewed during discovery.

Options include public or unlisted browser stores, private organizational listings, and enterprise-managed browser deployment. The correct model depends on security, support, and user access requirements.

Yes. Settings and destinations can be designed around role, access, environment, or use case so editors do not see capabilities that are irrelevant or unavailable to them.

The cost depends on the CMS, environments, brands, locales, rules, integrations, security requirements, rollout, documentation, and support scope. Each proposal is therefore custom.

Licensing, source access, reusable foundations, customer-specific configuration, maintenance, and intellectual-property terms are agreed transparently in the commercial documents.

Yes. A proposal can include warranty, maintenance, platform-change support, new mappings, feature evolution, store releases, and agreed response expectations.

No vendor affiliation or endorsement is implied unless explicitly stated. Platform names are used to describe compatibility, experience, or potential implementation scope.